Breaking AP News

Loading...

Thursday, September 28, 2006

Polls polls and more polls

It is getting to be that time of year. So let's try to dive right in to it shall we?

Oregon Governor
Zogby has the Oregon Governor's race doing just what he had said. Closing hard and Kulongoski by 3%. By the way that is a fascinating chart for all the races.

Hibbits has a poll out today showing the race at 4%. Hibbits is tracking with Zogby. These two polls together seem to bolster our report last week that the race was a dead heat according to a Moore poll.

So while the liberals were crowing about their supposed double digit lead we calmly predicted that by the end of the month this would be a single digit race. Of course that is true and most of the Republican prognosticators were right. Who was wrong? Well folks like Torrid who for some reason just had to continue to hang on to the errant belief that somehow Kulongoski was striding toward a double digit victory. Sorry Torrid, don't mean to pick on you, but you are the one who said "it's just not a race at this point... But keep dreamin."

Oregon M48 (Rainy Day Amendment)
On the surface there was a pretty big difference here between the polling I have seen (mostly Rasmussen) and Hibbits' poll. Although reading a little deeper into the Hibbits poll we find that he is admitting that the voters still have not dialed in to the measures and that his numbers may be a little soft.

Hibbits is calling it 32 YES and 42 NO. That is almost upside down from other polling that I have seen. Albeit I have not seen any polling in the last month and half or so, so there could have been some movement I guess. Although then Hibbits throws a curve when he takes away the leanings.

Still based on the polling I have seen from two other polling firms over the summer this is a pretty big differential. Unlike the lefties I am not going to jump to the conclusion that Hibbits is bad and quickly go around looking for someone to tell me what I want to hear. No there is something going on here and we have dueling numbers, Hibbits, Rasmussen and McClaughlin. Hibbits being the one on the outside.

Hibbits really is a good pollster and actually usually conservative in his forecasting so I think that there are other numbers in the crosstabs that might give us a better indication as to why his numbers are so different. He gives us a hint when he admits that voters are not "dialed in" yet.

Oregon M45 (Term Limits)
This one ads to the curiosity. Hibbits is saying that this measure is polling 51% YES and 40% NO. This number is radically different than the polling I have seen from at least three different polling firms and does not jibe with the results of recent term limits issues that have been on ballots elsewhere. There has been a Rasmussen tracking poll that showed this measure at about 60% YES and below 30% NO. That poll had been pretty consistent even up to last week. The Rasmussen poll also was in line with a McClaughlin poll that was saying the same thing about 5 weeks ago.

What has changed in the last several months? Heck in the last week?

As I have said before, Hibbits is a pretty reliable pollster. So his numbers, if I were running the campaign, would cause me to sit up and take a second look at things. However if I tie in all the other polling information that I have. Tie in the fact that the opposition has been stuck in neutral on fundraising and organization. Tie in the customary support, even up to last month in Kansas City, TLs gets at the polls... All together and I have to wonder what was going on in the Hibbits poll this time around. It could be that he just caught this one on the outsides of his margin for error. Hey that happens and is why they always make sure to clarify that there is a margin of error.

Finally I look at Hibbits' statement "voters still have not dialed in" to these measures. It is as if he has seen something that caused him to question and he wanted to be perfectly clear these numbers are not "solid" numbers.

Washington Senate (McGavick v Cantwell)
Again we get to point to the error of the liberal spin meisters. Remember how they were crowing that Cantwell (Democrat) had put McGavick (Republican) to bed here in Washington? Yet I mentioned in the comments here on this blog that the Cantwell bump was merely an anomaly and that the race was a single digit nail biter.

The Zogby Battleground poll is calling the Washington Senate race a 50% (Cantwell) and 43% (McGavick) a 7 point race. Rasmussen recently said it was a 48 to 42 race. What Zogby is overlooking are Cantwell's huge negatives. This seat is still much closer than the Democrats would like.

National Scene
Nationally the Republicans are, as we said here a couple of weeks ago, turning the tide. We are, admittedly, behind in some races, however I like our chances of overcoming most if not all of those deficits.

In PA Santorum looks like he is in trouble (46% to 40%). However one of the reasons he is in trouble is because conservatives there are grumbling that he supported Arlen Specter in the primary a few years ago over the conservative running against him. Those Republicans that are grumbling will come back. In the end they know that Rick Santorum is a solid Republican and they will come home. Also... Bob Casey Jr. is a notoriously bad closer.

DeWine in Ohio is also hot on the heels of Brown with a HUGE amount of undecideds. Incumbent DeWine should hold that seat.

We also see from Zogby that Tennessee is trending towards the Republican and away from Democrat Ford. So there goes another seat that the Democrats were counting on.

What Zogby is not showing is Montana. Montana is another seat the Democrats were hoping to pick up but that is just not happening.

So what we have are two seats that have moved back into the Republican column. We have a seat (Washington) in which the Republicans seem to be putting into play and the Democrats will have to fight HARD to keep it. And we have two other seats in which the Republicans are behind yet the internal circumstances work in favor of the Republicans.

Conclusion
The conclusion is that the Republicans hold the Senate... Heck they may even pick up a seat.

Saxton has Kulongoski on the run and the taxes issue is working.

McGavick is hot on the heels of Cantwell and Cantwell is a notoriously bad campaigner.

Oregon conservatives have their work cut out for them on the ballot measures. Now is not the time to go to sleep.


Yip Yip

27 comments:

Sniper #1 said...

Coyote, I'm just not seeing it in Montana for some odd reason. Do you know something that we don't? ^_-

Also, I finally bit the bullet. After something that Kulongoski said, I realized that even though Saxton is slimy and awful, I'm going to vote for him...I didn't want to, but I realize the implications.

Doesn't mean I like it, but I pretty much have no choice.

And I pray that Mary Starrett drops out.

coyotesmybee-atch said...

Coyote,

Once again you show just how politically naive you truly are. Anyone who would say that Rasmussen (a phone recorded poll) is anywhere close to as credible as Hibbitts is a true political rookie or has yet to learn anything through his past experience.

This also shows how bad the people are who are running the campaign for the spending cap. The fact that they would spend any money and make any strategic decisions based on numbers given to them from Rasmussen is just hilarious.

I also Conrad Burns will end up winning in Montana but how would you know this? Every poll there shows him down by at least 6 points. So let me get this right. Santorum down by six in Penn and he is in major trouble, Conrad down by six and it’s a disappointment to Democrats, and McGavick down by 7 and he is closing hard? WOW now that’s some good analysis.

Anonymous said...

As a Republican, you should be pulling against 48. TABOR virtually destroyed the Republican party in Colorado.

Fallout from TABOR flipped both houses of the legislature to Democratic for the first time in the state's history and now the D's will be taking back the governor's mansion for the firt time in a dozen years.

Sniper #1 said...

Bee-atch:

Bad news:
USA Today/Gallup
08/23 - 08/27
641 LV
45% Burns
48% Tester
5% Undecided

Division: Tester +3.0

Not all polls have him up by 6.

coyotesmybee-atch said...

Really? Did you just do that? You sited a month old poll? SHUT UP!

Bad Man said...

I'm waiting for the Riley Polls to come out in about two weeks. I think Ted will find out he's in bigger trouble than he thinks. It couldn't happen to a more deserving guy. The sooner he is gone the better; in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

Kulongoski is running a stand pat strategy. "Children, I am on your side." That is the theme on his paid advertisements, both radio and TV. Kulongoski also repeated his theme in todays debate on OPB radio.

Clearly, todays debate, as the questions were framed was on friendly ground for Kulongoski.

Ron Saxton was good, but must figure out how to strip the veneer off Kulongoski's schtick. Yes, it's for the children. OR IS IT. Is it really for the Unions. Are we best off when we always turn to the government? That seems to be Kulongoski's message.

Ron did a good job, but at least in this debate never had K. on the defensive.

For independent undecided voters: Family wage jobs, more money in your back pocket, and education. Be specific on schools, ie phonics and discipline.

Anonymous said...

Kind of funny how you pick what you like from each poll.

People of Oregon do not want to pay any taxes but expect police service, fire engines, good education..

What did Saxton ever accomplish? He even cheated to send his kid to a better school while trying to champion equality. What a crook.

Anonymous said...

I see torrid has failed to show his face around here (unless he is anon), but I suspect that the real reason is he was too busy posting on his own blog and commenting on Blueoregon.

I would love to get a FOIA and get his computer records...for a public employee, he spends more time politicking online than doing his job. Whatever!

But he is just a hopeful liberal, who will not have much hope left after October is come and gone. Kulo has lost momentum in Sept, will lose the lead in Oct, and then lose the election in Nov.

Red Dog said...

Take a look at this new blog that exposes Rob Brading's lies.

Red Dog said...

www.bradinglies.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

Amon 10:19....you can get the computer records of any public employee you wish, just file a public information request.

I am Coyote said...

Beeatch,
Did you really say that?

Are you really that stupid?

First, I did not say that Santorum was in "major" trouble. Did I? Wait let's review (for the thick folk)... Nope that is NOT what I said and was NOT my analysis.

What I said was it "looks" like Santorum was in trouble. Yet when you look closer at the circumstances he is not as far down as the Zogby poll indicates. So there... Yep dumb (you cannot claim you were ignorant on this one because it was all in front of you) statement number one.

Now I hate to continue to prove to everyone on this board that I am smarter than you... However...

Did I say that Rasmussen is anywhere close to as credible as Hibbits? Well silly many I did not. I included Rasmussen in the grouping of polls that I have seen. Oh and by the way Rasmussen is close to the others. Actually it was Torrid Joe who puts Rasmussen above Zogby.

I for one am a little leary of Rasmussen. Although he has gained a great deal more credibility over the last few years and has worked his schtick into a pretty reliable pollster.

So is Rasmussen MY favorite? Not yet. Is Rasmussen coming around? Yes. Only a political rookie with an axe to grind would overlook reality.

Now where did your statement regarding the spending cap campaign come from? Just what decisions are they making based on a Rasmussen poll. Please tell me what major tactical decision was made on a Rasmussen polling question. Obviously you are a deep campaign insider. (Although dubious in that we have just proven you are not capable of reading, comprehending and then analyzing a simple post... lord help any down ticket candidate who might actually take advice from you... oiy... although judging by your statements you are a Democrat so that is a good thing.)

Wow... Such a simple smack-down on political wannabe so early in the morning. Heck I have not even had my coffee yet.

Now go back and reread paragraph one of this comment (regarding the Santorum analysis) and... shut up.

Yip Yip

coyotesmybee-atch said...

You said Santorum is in trouble down by six yet Burns is going to be victorious down by six... Your still an idiot.

You heavily alluded to the fact that you just cannot believe these Hibbitts numbers when Rasmussen has been telling you such great things. No credible campaign will ever comment heavily on a Rasmussen poll.

Further, the spending cap campaign has paid Rasmussen to conduct polling for them. Most consultants make strategic decisions based on polling...that’s where I got that from.

Wow you are so much smarter than me...so much smarter in fact that Atkinson is competing against Kulongoski to be the next Governor of Oregon...oh wait that did not happen... SHUT UP!

YUP YUP

I am Coyote said...

Beeatch,
I said it "looks" like Santorum is in trouble and you STILL are unable to read and comprehend. So evidence shows that you are... well... dumb.

Although you can call names. You have that going for you. Unfortunately when someone watches the flow they would quickly conclude that you are... well... dumb... LOL....

Again you dig yourself deeper into the "dumbhole." You claim that I said I "just cannot believe Hibbits' numbers?"

Oh I did? Where did I say that? Ah!... well... Look! I didn't say that you just did a poor job analyzing this post.

What I DID say was that if I were in any of those campaigns Hibbits' numbers would cause me to sit up and take notice. Well good golly miss Molly that is like 180 degrees different from what you just said. Dumb...

Oh and what does Atkinson have to do with it? Oh were you the one saying that Atkinson would not get of single digits? Great political analysis. Which is of course why you are afraid to put your name on your brilliant analysis... lol...

Now... please... shut up before I embarrass you more.

yip yip

I am Coyote said...

But you will be back. You remind me of the Black Knight in Monty Python's "Search for the Holy Grail."

coyotesmybee-atch said...

You're right I am back...

First of all saying "what I said is it 'looks' like Santorum is in big trouble" being some kind of validation that you never said he was in trouble is DUMB.

Second, pretending you were not insinuating that Rasmussen is credible and yet Hibbitts poll had some problems is DUMB.

Yelling at others for name calling while calling someone dumb is DUMB.

Third, using a lame word such as dumb is well…DUMB

Forth, continually calling people out for not using there real name while you go by the hilarious name of coyote... like REALLY DUMB.

YUP you’re dumb YUP

coyotesmybee-atch said...
This post has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Yes, I am anonymous and proud of it too, to boot. "keep'em guessing" and focussing on the logic, and reason, not a pissing match between personalities.

That said, Coyotesmybee-atch looses credibility in my book because he shows by his attempted analysis he is more interested in a personal pissing match with Coyote than reasoned analysis.

Lets face it, polls are an inexact science that is valuble, but obviously is subject to various interpretations. Polls are guide posts. The art of successful poll reading can only be determined over time by a track record. That is true because "winning politics" overall is an art not a science.

Elections are a performance business!

I am Coyote said...

Beeatch,
What was that you said?

"Come back here you coward. I can still bite!"... lol

Not dumb... actually pretty dog gonned funny.

You STILL cannot read and comprehend? I mean does one have to spell it out for you? Golly I feel like the French guards on the castle walls taunting the hapless Arther in SFtHG.

I said it "looks" like Santorum is in trouble. As in... slowly now so you don't pull a muscle... "looks like, but upon closer examination..." There, now was that so hard? I just never figured someone would be thick enough so as not to figure that out BY THE THIRD TIME... hehe...

Oh and "idiot" is so much better than "dumb."

And to your second point... I see you are now able to devine what I feel and think eh? Well based on your very poor track record of analyzing what is in front of you in black and white that is a truly scary idea.

I am indeed insinuating that Rasmussen may be credible. He is used by hundreds of credible campaigns around the country. I myself would have used Riley or Moore for an Oregon issue but if I have other polls to compare Rasmussen with then I'll take it. (oh... I kinda said that before right? Repeating myself for the thick and unfortunate is tiresome).

I never insinuated that Hibbets had problems. Did you even go back to READ what I had said before you came back to embarrass yourself again?

I like Hibbits' polling. He may be the best at polling the state of Oregon. He is usually pretty conservative in his analysis and thus you get HIS qualifier that the "voters have still not dialed in."

Which of course matches with what another pollster was telling me two days ago when word of this story was going to be coming out.

So beeatch it helps to know people in the industry and get their take on it as well. It also helps to actually READ what is written before you make a dumb statement.

Now... I believe I shall do as King Arther did in SFtHG. That is to walk away as you sit/stand there on your stumps, that used to be legs, and bleed while calling out to continue the fight.

At a certain point one just feels a sense of compassion for the ill-equiped.

yip yip

I am Coyote said...

Anon1053,
I don't have a problem with folks who are anonymous. That is just a straw man that beeatch likes to bring up.

My main concern is that if someone is going to make a pretty sizeable claim they should bring one of two things to the table.

1)some solid information to back the claim. you know... polling information... research... yadda yadda.

2) lacking the solid research, (because some folks just can't release the sourcing and i understand that) then we should look to the reputation of the individual. What kind of track record does this person have? Can we trust the voracity of their claim.

So some folks have though the are anonymous have through an psudonym developed a pretty good track record. None of us are perfect and that is understandable. Yet when one resorts to name calling as their primary response to intelligent debate then... well... it just get's dumb.

Finally Anon1053, you were spot on with your description of polling and politics. More art than science.

What I attempted to do in this post was contrast several different polls with the poll published in the Oregonian.

Anonymous said...

Thank you Coyote, we all appreciate a pat on the back from time to time. Frankly, incouragement is a part of politics that gets lost because of "rivalry". Cooperation and collaberation are keys in the art of politics that many times is a casualty to the dictates of human nature.

I take your points on the pros and cons of the question: To be anonymous or not to be anonymous.

And your analysis is more rational than bee-atch with the caveat of politics being an art.

To bee-atch: Get your facts straight and your quotes right before you make assertions because that failure makes you less persuasive. And isn't that what it's all about?

Anonymous said...

Hey, bee-atch; I gotta say "you got bitch slapped" but good. I gotta admit it's fun to see a good old-fashioned back alley ass whupping. Roadkill looks good compared to your sorry ass attempt at cutting, barbed politcal repartee.

bee-atch, you got crushed and grinded into rotten hamburger.

Time to throw you into the trash with the rest of the smelly garbage.

coyotesmybee-atch said...

“No there is something going on here and we have dueling numbers, Hibbits, Rasmussen and McClaughlin. Hibbits being the one on the outside.”

That right there insinuates that Hibbits poll must be inaccurate because other pollsters (who none of which real campaigners take seriously) have had different results

“This one ads to the curiosity. Hibbits is saying that this measure is polling 51% YES and 40% NO. This number is radically different than the polling I have seen from at least three different polling firms and does not jibe with the results of recent term limits issues that have been on ballots elsewhere.”

Again here you are attempting to discredit Hibbits.

“DeWine in Ohio is also hot on the heels of Brown with a HUGE amount of undecided’s. Incumbent DeWine should hold that seat.”

Bush numbers are horrible in Ohio and DeWine has to put up with a Republican Governor with some of the worst polling numbers in the nation. Yet you are the only Republican that seems to think DeWine is the favorite. Further, where is the evidence you always demand backing up your claims here?

“What Zogby is not showing is Montana. Montana is another seat the Democrats were hoping to pick up but that is just not happening.”

Again where in the hell are your numbers backing up your claims?

Again, if past posts are suppose to give your anonymous nature credibility your past posts like this one and your support of Atkinson with your claims that he was a credible candidate have shown you to have no credibility.

Further, I am not going to respond to the anonymous posts because as Coyote says I really should not have to considering this is what he himself feels you are not credible unless you are named after a type of dog…

Oh yeah… that was an old fashion ass whooping on a blog. I am so excited by myself because my only true life accomplishment is writing on an internet blog for political hack jobs to read and feel like they are part of the process. Please give me a moment to sit back and gasp in my glorious moment of typing on a computer. Ruff Ruff I go by the coyote who is another guys bee-atch.

Yup Yup

I am Coyote said...

lol... and unlike King Arthur and the French guards, you come back so that I may taunt you some more.

I claimed Atkinson was a credible candidate and he finished only a few points behind Mannix. (Please don't tell us Mannix was NOT a credible candidate.) And you, presumably were one of the folks saying he would never get past single digits.

There... bada bing... again.

I did not need to go into depth on Montana's number oh young patawa learner. It was tossed into the mix and even you agreed with that. People know who I am... you know... the author of the blog? You know the one when he has made predictions has been correct much more often than not.

And I have no idea what you were trying to get at by hashing and rehashing my comments on Hibbits. I know that "I" trust Hibbits. I know that you really really wish you could tell me how and what I really think and believe... but you know what?

You can't.

So you are wasting your time trying to, as I said before, devine what I think and believe after I have already told you.

So now you can go back to watching Hardball and pretend that you are learning something about politics.

From here on out I think everyone could refer to the numberous times, in this post alone, that I have so easily taken you to task. Whatever you do don't let your democratic friends know who you are for real. You'll never live down this verbal spanking.

However... If you would take the time to go back and read all the places you went wrong you may actually learn something from this experience young patawa.

Yip Yip Yippeee...

coyotesmybee-atch said...

Now we are starting to get somewhere because you are not able to debunk anything I am saying.

You want to say I am one of the guys who said Atkinson would never break single digits which I am not and you have no proof.

You say I am a democrat which I am not and you have no proof.

And you want to argue a Montana race which you say is safe Republican but not one poll has the Republican ahead.

Riiiight you won this one.

Yup Yup

I am Coyote said...

See my comments:

7:22 AM
8:42 AM
10:55 AM
5:26 PM

One wonders why you try. But that's ok, you drive up my hit count.

yip yip

Custom Links Bookmarks

Digg

Infocious RSS raw feed - channel BNAPPOLITICS